RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #614,060
New ResponseNew Response
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?


For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?


Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?


What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?


What should be added to the SBRCs and why?


What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?

 The Canez model included the relevant guidelines in order to make the correct decision of “make-or-buy. ” In addition, the constant effectiveness monitoring is important in such functions. Coming from the illustrations I have got suggested above, we may see that following the methods according to the type allowed to review often the firm inner processes, taking in to accounts often the main strategic goals. The particular core strategic activities usually remained within the firm, although the non-core actions happen to be reviewed across the particular 4 variables to figure out if they should proceed in-house or “buy” outside the body. The examination is performed to make sure quality control, safety, useful flow of the particular processes within the company, just as well as to place together the correct performance methods and do something about them.
  Make-or-buy is a couple of critiquing the bottom line but not only. Although the instances brought to you above discuss “buy” through outsourcing, the same type associated with analysis might be done along with “make” and whole body.
  In business administration, like within every single various other realm, there are styles, and likewise market trends, manufacturing advancements, price and expense imbalances of just about every facet the fact that may have an result (like home – while described in the example above), and also the incredibly debatable subject of command, and keeping all your own personal greeting cards close and hidden. All of these and more, cause legitimate factors when choosing to make-or-buy.
  For occasion, if “make” is far more high-priced than “buy, ” but it is imperative to keep technologies, or marketing programmes, or even, in fact, any various other part of the particular development, service or perhaps advertising chains, in-house for whatever reason, in comparison with the least most affordable selection may very well become the right choice.
 <img src="http://www.imagespourtoi.com/lesimages/oui-oui/photo-oui-oui-9.jpg" />
  Exactly what I was saying actually is, do definitely not look only at the unimportant stuff. In order for you to make the right choice creatively, one must look into the much larger picture, consider initial as well as extensive, and combine that within to the decision formula of Make-or-Buy parameters, which are ultimately correlated, but might be crucial to often the outcome.
  http://oui-madame.co.uk  is usually a model developed in 1988, by Zeithaml et 's to measure the good quality of service in organizations. The name of this model contains the two words: Service and even Quality, combined.
  The model assists as a good technique employed to examine the gap among two seemingly similar boundaries: Organization performance plus customer fulfillment, meaning this degree that the company meets its consumers’ requirements for quality of program, as it is perceived by simply all of them.
  Even though might be wrongly regarded as parallel, these a pair of variables: Organization performance plus buyer satisfaction, are really very different and generally not really even correlated. Let us explain:
  Customer total satisfaction is determined by the connection between customer expectancy of the service, and the service delivery inside reality. The larger the hole between buyer expectations together with the service given (i. e., customers have much less than what they anticipated – we like to help call it together with a bit of humor : the “Oy-Vey factor”) ~ the lower their fulfillment will be.
  An opposite difference may, of course, control customer satisfaction (we typically like to name it – the “WOW component, ” when organizations choose to supply clients using more than what they will bargained for).
  Enterprise functionality, however , is determined simply by the quality of program relative to the competition, as well as relative to the particular company’s promises, whichever is an essential factor influencing customer anticipation. For that reason, if a customer desires to receive fast food plus its shipped upon requirement, she is going to probably be contented; even so, she is going to also realize that this enterprise’s effectiveness is probably lesser in comparison with that of the fabulous restaurant across the neighborhood.
  Understandably, it was formulated primarily for service-oriented, as well as service-core industries. Although almost all organizations do provide many sort of customer program as an element of their delivery offer to the clients, the service-core sectors are normally additional requiring finding a approach to measure his or her program quality, as their efficiency, as well as their very own aggressive advantage, depend primarily on this component.
  Often the measuring, of course, is important in order to assistance with the detection connected with weaknesses, and the developing and implementation of development strategies

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?


if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”


How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?


Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)


If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”


Any additional comments to add?

Created at 11/12/2020 4:06 AM  by  
Last modified at 11/12/2020 4:06 AM  by