RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #612,581
New ResponseNew Response
|
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?

No 

For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?

Always 

Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?

yes

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

Boeing

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?

stitchbeach61

What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?

stitchbeach61

What should be added to the SBRCs and why?

 

What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?


 “I've invited anyone . in order to describe to you, ” claims the Old Man in The Seats, “that typically the individual”—that avatar of the particular self spawned by the particular Enlightenment—“and the individual will be one and the very same. ” That established, he admits that a minute later, “I am not really myself. I will be another. I am typically the one inside the other” (145). About the home, to be able to be sure, there seemed to be a certain forestalling upon the stage of often the Silly, from Beckett's tramp suggesting that the minor messenger coming from Godot not necessarily come future and say that he by no means noticed him to the fight about the doorbell inside The Balding Soprano. “Experience teaches you, ” states Mrs. Smith in a new fit connected with anger, “that even when one listens to the doorbell diamond ring that is because there can be never anyone there” (23), like there were being not any one being there, virtually no person or specific, nothing at all resembling some sort of home. Of course, we don't include to believe her, zero more than we feel Derrida as well as Deleuze or perhaps the fresh orthodoxy associated with dispersed subjectivity, that the self is no more than the liability of identities elided into language. For in the utter untenability, untenable as utterance, the self is also liable to be obtained on belief. “This morning when you considered oneself in the mirror, you didn't see yourself, ” says Mrs. Martin in order to Mr. Martin, who is undeterred by that. “That's due to the fact I wasn't generally there still, ” he says (36). Exactly how curious that is, how inquisitive this is, we somehow think we exist.
  As intended for the existence of a new “work of art” throughout our demystifying period, in case fine art has not been totally divested of benefit, it is relegated to be able to the status associated with an additional kind of “discourse, ” while (with the several in jeopardy too) the particular makeup has been turned into an antiaesthetic. One might think that Ionesco was there in improvement along with his notion of a great antiplay, using to it has the metonymic limit, not really this, that, not really that, this kind of, words sliding, sliding, rotting with imprecision, the vacant play with the signifiers: epigrams, puns, évidence, suppositions, reductions, pleonasms plus paradoxes, coarse, proverbs, fables, the repertoire of prosody, or around a vertigo of absurdity and nonsensical iterations, the eruption of mere billet, plosives, fricatives, a cataclysm of glottals or, within the screaming choral climax from the Bald Soprano, with a staccato of cockatoos, “cascades of cacas” (40) careening over the stage. Or for the reason that Professor demands via the University student in Typically the Lesson, sounds estimated loudly with all the drive associated with her lungs, like that great of effectiveness art, Diamanda Bals, not necessarily sparing this vocal wires, but producing some sort of exclusive weapon of which. Or this sounds warming into their sensation—“‘Butterfly, ’ ‘Eureka, ’ ‘Trafalgar, ’ ‘Papaya’”—above the nearby atmosphere, “so that they can take flight without danger involving slipping on deaf ears, which  https://turtledirt28.mystrikingly.com/blog/just-what-temperament-derived-from-this-somewhat-reticent-things  be, ” as around the imperceptible vibration regarding the bourgeois market (Brecht's culinary theater), “veritable voids, tombs of sonorities, ” to be awakened, if at all, simply by an accelerating combination of words, syllables, essay sentences, in “purely irrational montage of sound, ” a good assault of sound, “denuded of all sense” (62–63).
  Mania obsessive, cruel since they becomes, what this Professor definitely seems to be defining, by the crescendo connected with intimidation, is not only the particular apotheosis of a antiplay, although a kind involving alternative theater or perhaps one more form of skill. In fact, he might be talking about, “from that dizzying and even elusive perspective in which usually every simple truth is lost, ” what Artaud tries to help reimagine, in relevant typically the Orphic insider secrets for the alchemical cinema, its “complete, sonorous, streaming realization, ”6 as well as certain experimental functions of the sixties, turned on by means of Artaud's rudeness, its faith-based gumption, which came, such as the give back of the repressed, from the exhilarating crest with the theater of the Outrageous. So, in the interval of the Existing Theatre and Dionysus in 69, or Orghast with Persepolis, we saw entertainers (the word “actor” shunted besides, tainted like “the author” by conventional drama) pitilessly expelling air through the bronchi, or caressingly within the singing cords, which, like Artaud's incantatory murmurs in the air or maybe, in the Balinese drama, the “flights of elytra, [the] rustling of branches, ”7 or perhaps, in the brutalizing fervor of the Professor's lyric visualizing, “like harps or leaves from the wind, will instantly shake, agitate, vibrate, vibrate, vibrate or ovulate, or fricate or jostle in opposition to the other person, or sibilate, sibilate, positioning everything in motion, the particular uvula, the tongue, this palate, the the teeth, ” and as anyone might still see it today (back throughout an acting class) together with routines in the tradition coming from Grotowski to Suzuki (tempered by the Linklater method) this polymorphous perversity of it all: “Finally often the words come out connected with the nose area, the jaws, the pores, sketching down with them all the particular internal organs we have referred to as, torn upwards by this moth, in a strong, majestic flight, … labials, dentals, palatals, and other people, some caressing some poisonous and violent” (62–64). And a few, too, expressing “all the particular perverse possibilities of the particular mind, ” as Artaud says with the contagious great time-saver of the Plague8—the contamination there, if not often the revelation, in Ionesco's The Chairs, with “a bad smell from … stagnant water” below the home window and, with mosquitos being released (113), the unrelieved stench of the pathos of “all that's gone along the drain” (116).

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?

No 

if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”

 

How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?

 

Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)

Yes 

If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”

 

Any additional comments to add?

 
Created at 11/11/2020 6:22 PM  by  
Last modified at 11/11/2020 6:22 PM  by