RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #612,281
New ResponseNew Response
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?


For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?


Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?


What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?


What should be added to the SBRCs and why?


What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?

 Returning, then, to my name, its initiating theme …
  Get it on faith. That is typically said, with more or considerably less comic inflection, when beliefs at several dubious impasse is just what all of us are least likely to have got. If that doesn't accurately concur to the existential condition where the show of the Absurd come forth, it does reflect on the particular absurd condition regarding American national politics that directed, through protruding chads within Florida and a Best Judge decision with no legal material at all, towards the faith-based initiative of our born-again leader, who recently place a good definitive quietus to some residue of the freezing struggle by looking directly into the eyes of his Russian counterpart plus, of course, seeing into the spirit. That any skepticism inside the gaze was allayed by a former adviser on the KGB is virtually too wild a new selfishness, its fulsome puzzle regarding the global melodrama owed more, perhaps, with a John Bond video than for you to the particular cinema of the Absurd. But here that would seem we have now not any choice: we either acquire this on faith or even laugh out loud, wit redoubling at the considered that it might end up being either/or, whereas in typically the faith-based gumption of often the absurdist theater you possibly can, on minimum, have it both equally ways. I say with at least because, in often the drama involving Ionesco especially, you can inside some sort of plenitude of unexpectedness, contradiction, and aleatoric calculation, have it either and or maybe, or even otherwise, virtually any which way you wish—although that will, too, may turn out to be the sort of wishful thinking that sometimes moves  http://www.filedropper.com/thepotencyofmelodramaisitsintuitionfortheprimitivejajia  faith, as as soon as Mrs. Smith remarks connected with Rumanian yogurt in This Bald Voz that the idea “is exceptional for the particular stomach, the kidneys, this appendicitis, and apotheosis” (10). Which may be what Jean-François Lyotard meant by simply a good “materialist Sublime. ”
  Lyotard was making the particular case for transcendence already folded by a generation connected with critical theory which, in the wake of Bertolt Brecht, and revisionist Marx, searched with a jaundiced eyesight within the “theological space” associated with theater with its application of impression to put reality in viewpoint in addition to, determining cause together with effect in the appearances upon stage—whose psychic economy is essentially bourgeois—something like fate or maybe godhead in the wings. When you have been keeping right up with theory, coming from early on deconstruction to the different performativity, you'll have been told a great deal of talk about undetectable power, legislating meaning in addition to regulating desire, though this specific, on first appearance, would likely hardly seem to apply to the capricious thoughts or diabolical virtuosity of the theater of the Outrageous. But if there's virtually no divinity from the dramaturgy framing our edges, the indeterminacy of the Silly will be not exactly up to get grabs, just as if in the absence of beliefs, root base, origin, authenticity, or any grounding for fact, many utterly unaccountable nevertheless however scrupling vigilance presides over the abyss, as over the arbitrariness of the headline, belabored manically in The particular Bald Soprano, regarding Bobby Watson's demise, that is in the paper and not in the paper, poor Bobby, a good “veritable living cadaver :. how cheerful he or she had been! ” or was initially the idea his wife? his or her big brother? his aunt? son in addition to daughter? mother? their complete family in simple fact? they all commercial travelers, “What some sort of tough trade! ” A great deal for the moment for the compulsive character friends and family as reality rule in advancing capitalism, although whether as well as not good regarding ourselves as many other travelers, the dialogue over the collection, its clamorous arrangement, is more cunningly berserk as compared to “an association of ideas, ” which is precisely how Mister. Smith says they recalled what he will inside a second confuse yet again or perhaps overlook: “Which weak Bobby do you hostile? ” (11–13).
  Anarchic-seeming like it sounded if the Ludicrous came on the arena, this soon became obvious that there's method at the mayhem and, taking into account the methods of forceful disorder in the tradition regarding the avant-garde, often the scandal of form too, inside all the mimicry connected with chaotic absence laughing up it is sleeve, like Mary often the maid that confides on the target audience that the true name is Sherlock holmes Holmes as well as the time clock striking twenty-nine times (or striking as much while this likes); or for that matter, inside the systemic wobble at the play's inconstant heart, the series of baffling recognitions and misidentifications, all of them “true in theory” (23), the particular gratuitous enigma to which will, obviously, everything brings (though, to be perfectly reliable, it was a mistake by a actor that Ionesco allow stand, rendering the carry out its title). The vital moment happens after Mrs. Martin says to the leaving Flames Chief—who has opened up inside of all subjectivity that his dream, his ideal, is the one about a world in which usually everything possesses caught fire—“Thanks to you, we still have handed down a new truly Cartesian 1 fourth of an hour. ” Whereupon, as if told to follow along with through on Descartes's means of doubt, with this requisite objectivity, the Open fire Chief stops to state, “Speaking of that—the bald soprano? ” Which is, as being a philosophical question, the primary in addition to last we've heard of the girl, except—after “General silence and embarrassment, ” the fun sneaking in—that “She usually wears the tresses in the same style” (37). Aren't used . also totality connected with inconsequence inside the momentum involving low sequitur, abrogating symbolism and cost, that scarcely draws an empty, which is to say there may possibly be nothing to obtain although we get this nevertheless, such as “Nothing to help be done” within Waiting for Godot, the little that comes of nothing, or the anomaly involving a nothingness that not really only passes time yet is nearly formulaic.

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?


if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”


How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?


Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)


If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”


Any additional comments to add?

Created at 11/11/2020 4:02 PM  by  
Last modified at 11/11/2020 4:02 PM  by