RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #611,929
New ResponseNew Response
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?


For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?


Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

General Motors

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?


What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?


What should be added to the SBRCs and why?


What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?

 Yet who can genuinely argue that it can be showing the whole storyline? In our ardor for the elemental, we certainly have renewed, and necessarily, absurdly, the truths associated with the child years, neurosis, and savagery—opposing often the apprehensions of belief and even magic to often the misapprehensions involving rationalism. Yet the melodramatic point of view, viewed from anywhere although on the inside itself, is eventually paranoid. Inside melodrama, actuality is definitely villainous and unnegotiable, and even the only way to help surpasse it is to make one's personal being the indisputable center involving all integrity. The alarmist hero is Faust with out Mephistopheles, undeterred will without having limit, Gargantua disguised as the hunchback of Notre Woman.
  To express the melodramatic vision is not in order to eliminate it. So having the habits of often the students, when expectations can be escalated into the powerful inane. The generation that will grew up affluently with a sense of power-lessness is now, rather powerfully, in the center associated with the phase. Ruthlessly positive they will conquer, many people are still insisting that will nobody is listening. The reality is, certainly since Chicago, most people is listening—though that reality alone may not alter sociable process or typically the mechanisms put in place long before our military-industrial structure. This may even be that we are usually dealing using forces that are presently irreversible, and hence actually unnegotiable. Given the pushes that will none of you understand, the human mystery, protest can only be position. It is at this specific point inside the theater that will we return to the particular tragic vision.
  Still, we have lived through a interval, typically the few years after Globe War II, when a facile sense of catastrophe had been a new pretext with regard to peace and quiet and evasion. Inside sad theatre, the psychological life and history of the consumer are organized to make his fate. It may possibly be similarly so is obviously, but we don't often believe it. It's excellent that we don't think it. In case living can be tragic, extra fat reason to be able to live as if the idea were tragic—that's also including theater to theater. By doing this a fake pathos. Often the activism of the 60s increased out of impatience with that pathos—a type of sentimental melodrama. This began by finding strength in a negative potential, by just a refusal to relinquish the power this had nearly no reason to believe it possessed. A guy, many of us came up to feel once again, is not merely a stamina in time yet some sort of common sense upon themselves.  http://cfdr.co.uk  is acted in the amount of his acts. At the borders of this judgment, the idea demonstrated with increasing occurrence the Law's coherence had been not our coherence. To be able to the diploma legislation believed the role associated with Success, there was defiance from the Law. Whatever the limitations connected with Destiny, we came up to behave as when we were on top of things. When that is the great illusion, it is possibly our most precious illusion. This brings us again to those expectations that have clear and present substance.
  If the desire for switch is sometimes magnified out of most possibility by the partisan, often the resistance to alter remains the scandal in spite of all pity f by simply embarrassed humanists. After all the just about all liberal definitely not this unregenerate. Some of us happen to be drastically chastened by university student refuse, yet we will be beguiled by means of privilege, dissuaded by grants, deflected simply by Fulbrights, caught by division, and—even whenever conscience can be next to overwhelming—returned for you to sin by means of educational distance, the academic version of accomplishing your own thing. So the potential fight takes position, with the administrators keeping the bag and the particular walnut creek ca retaining the strength. Undoubtedly, the petitions follow after, yet that's only the reflex of a fixed character, returned simply by addiction to a convention. In this way a funny at our expense. This is inevitably true when scholars throughout the humanities are defending their specialities as in the event they were eternal verities, when in fact a new self-control is sustained solely by way of the moving continuity from the dissolutions. Instead regarding invoking “standards” to protect what is clearly going under, we might pay focus to what have been documented all over our literature—that standards are discovered precisely in jeopardy, as a group of abolitions; as William Carlos Williams says within Paterson, “knowledge, undispersed, their own undoing. ”
  That is astonishing just how much uncatalogued precedent still are operating in all of our procedures, though philosophically many of us know better. Even whatever we take to be analysis with the frontiers of information is still constrained by means of pointless usages through the recent. We see that in every discipline that asserts upon using the word because if at this time there were being actually defined boundaries of questions rather than a new structure of hypotheses with regards to such limits. In the humanities, whose province has customarily included manners and probe and the strategies regarding feeling, it might turn out to be honest to say that the most authentic studies being done by experimenters beyond the system—by activists, mystics, discipline workers, dope fiends, rebel priests, hippies, occultists, system fetishists, deviants, mutants, and conscientious objectors. Just about all these forms have demonstrated that the older standard modern society of stable types was severely limited in it has the repertoire of actions and lifestyle choices. As we maneuver inward through hidden space or to the outside to the galaxies, our values are being inhibited by way of a vaster organic of available roles. Lecturers doing analyses of books the fact that illustrate the destructive factor or the demonic shedding connected with multiple persona or maybe travels to typically the cardiovascular of night or even the perverse infractions in the Magic Theater are today going through students some regarding whom will be conscientious providers of our most exciting metaphors and formal strategies. Communicate of the Double or perhaps the Secret Sharer, and this individual sits down there, coolly, wanting to know if you have this courage to help acknowledge him before your eyes.

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?


if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”


How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?


Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)


If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”


Any additional comments to add?

Created at 11/11/2020 1:49 PM  by  
Last modified at 11/11/2020 1:49 PM  by