RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #611,911
New ResponseNew Response
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?


For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?


Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?


What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

Walt Disney

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?


What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?


What should be added to the SBRCs and why?


What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?

 The Canez model integrated the relevant variables within order to make the right decision of “make-or-buy. ” In add-on, the regular effectiveness monitoring is crucial in such procedures. Coming from the instances I own indicated above, we can see that adopting the methods according to the style made it possible for to review this firm central processes, getting in to accounts this main strategic goals. The core strategic activities always continued to be within the organization, yet the non-core routines will be reviewed across typically the 4 details to decide if they should proceed in-house or “buy” outwardly. The examination is performed to be sure quality control, safety, useful flow of typically the processes inside the company, just as well as to put together the proper performance actions and do something about them.
  Make-or-  http://cfdr.co.uk  is a matter of examining the bottom line nevertheless not merely. Although the illustrations brought to you preceding discuss “buy” through freelancing, the same type associated with analysis could possibly be done together with “make” and the usage.
  In business administration, like throughout any different realm, there are clothing, and as well market trends, manufacturing improvements, price and price variances of every single facet the fact that may have an impact (like real estate – since described within the example above), and also the incredibly controversial subject of control, and keeping all the greeting cards close and concealed. These and more, cause legitimate considerations when making a decision to make-or-buy.
  For example, if “make” is more costly than “buy, ” nevertheless it is imperative to hold systems, or marketing stations, or perhaps, in fact, almost any various other part of the generation, service or perhaps advertising and marketing chains, in-house for whatever reason, compared to the least cost-effective decision may very well become the right choice.
  What I was saying actually is, do definitely not look only at the unimportant stuff. In order to help make the right decision creatively, one must look into the bigger picture, consider interim as well as long lasting, and combine that inside to the decision formula of Make-or-Buy parameters, which are usually in a roundabout way correlated, but could end up being crucial to often the outcome.
  ServQual model is a model developed in 1988, by Zeithaml et 's to measure the good quality of service throughout companies. The name of the particular model includes the 2 words: Service plus Quality, combined.
  The type assists as a technique made use of for you to analyze the difference concerning two seemingly parallel details: Organization performance plus buyer total satisfaction, meaning this degree whereby the organization meets its consumers’ demands for quality of service, as it is perceived by way of them.
  Although they might be improperly perceived as parallel, these a pair of guidelines: Venture performance together with buyer full satisfaction, are in fact very different and commonly certainly not even correlated. Allow me personally explain:
  Customer fulfillment is determined by often the relationship between customer expectancy of the service, and even the support delivery around actuality. The larger the distance between purchaser expectations together with the service provided (i. e., customers find much less than what they predicted – we like in order to call it with a new bit of humor ~ the “Oy-Vey factor”) ~ the lower their fulfillment would be.
  An opposite difference might, of course, power customer satisfaction (we typically like to name it – the “WOW element, ” when companies come to a decision to present clients with more than what that they bargained for).
  Enterprise functionality, nonetheless is determined by simply the quality of service relative to the competition, or perhaps relative to the particular company’s promises, whichever is the central factor influencing customer expectations. As a result, if a customer can expect to receive fast food plus its provided upon hope, she will probably be happy; nevertheless, she is going to also recognize that this enterprise’s functionality is probably lesser as compared to that of the premium restaurant across the street.
  Understandably, the[desktop] was designed primarily for service-oriented, or even service-core industries. Although the majority of organizations do supply many sort of customer program as an element of their delivery deal for their clients, the service-core industries are by natural means even more in need of finding a way to measure their particular assistance quality, as their efficiency, as well as their particular competitive border, depend generally on this element.
  Often the measuring, of course, is important in order to support with the recognition associated with weaknesses, and the developing and implementation of improvement strategies

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?


if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”


How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?


What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?


Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)


If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”


Any additional comments to add?

Created at 11/11/2020 1:39 PM  by  
Last modified at 11/11/2020 1:39 PM  by