RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #611,163
New ResponseNew Response
|
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?

No 

For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?

Always 

Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?

yes

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

Texaco

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?

beetvoyage18

What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?

beetvoyage18

What should be added to the SBRCs and why?

 

What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?


 Returning, then, to my headline, it has the initiating theme ;-(
 
 <img src="https://mishkanet.com/img/how-much-tummy-time-for-a-1-month-old.jpg" />
  Carry it on faith. Which normally said, with whole lot more or much less comic inflection, when faith at a few dubious impasse is exactly what we are going to least likely to have got. If that doesn't just correspond to the existential condition that the movie theater of the Ludicrous come forth, it does reflect found on typically the absurd condition involving American state policies that guided, through dangling chads inside Florida and also a Substantial The courtroom decision with no legal compound at all, towards the faith-based initiative of our born-again president, who recently placed a new definitive quietus to some residue of the cold conflict by looking into the eyes involving his / her Russian counterpart and even, indeed, seeing into their heart. That any skepticism at the gaze was allayed by a former adviser of the KGB is pretty much too untamed a conceit, its fulsome incertidumbre connected with the global dram&oacute;n owed more, perhaps, into a Wayne Bond movie than to the theater of this Absurd. Although here it would look we have now not any choice: we either acquire the idea on faith or perhaps laugh out loud, wit redoubling at the believed that it might become either/or, whereas in often the faith-based gumption of typically the absurdist theater you are able to, from minimum, have it both equally ways. I say from nominal because, in this drama of Ionesco in particular, you can inside a good plenitude of unexpectedness, contradiction, and aleatoric computation, have it either and or perhaps, or even otherwise, just about any which often way you wish—although the fact that, too, may turn out to be the sort of wishful thinking that sometimes moves as faith, as any time Mrs. Smith remarks associated with Rumanian yogurt in This Bald Voz that it “is superb for the stomach, the kidneys, the appendicitis, and apotheosis” (10). Which may be precisely what Jean-Fran&ccedil;ois Lyotard meant by way of some sort of “materialist Sublime. ”
  Lyotard was making this case for transcendence already folded by a generation of critical theory which, inside wake of Bertolt Brecht, and revisionist Marx, viewed with a jaundiced vision around the “theological space” of movie theater with its deployment of picture to place reality in standpoint together with, determining cause and impact in the appearances with stage—whose psychic economy is essentially bourgeois—something like fate or maybe godhead in the wings. When you have been keeping right up with theory, through earlier deconstruction to the different performativity, you'll have observed a great deal of talk about unseen power, legislating meaning in addition to regulating want, though this particular, on very first appearance, might hardly look to apply to the capricious thoughts or diabolical virtuosity on the show of the Ludicrous. Still if there's no divinity inside the dramaturgy framework our stops, the indeterminacy of the Stupid can be not exactly up for grabs, as though in often the absence of beliefs, beginnings, origin, authenticity, or even just about any grounding for simple fact, several utterly unaccountable although however scrupling vigilance presides in the abyss, as over often the arbitrariness of the announcement, belabored manically in The particular Bald Soprano, connected with Bobby Watson's death, that is at the paper and not necessarily within the paper, poor Bobby, a “veritable living d&eacute;pouille . how cheerful he or she was initially! ” or was initially that his wife? his dad? his aunt? son together with daughter? mother? his / her complete family in reality? they all commercial travelers, “What the hard trade! ” Much for the minute for the low fellow household as reality basic principle inside of advancing capitalism, although whether or not or perhaps not we think involving ourselves as guy tourists, the dialogue from the collection, its clamorous arrangement, is definitely more cunningly berserk as compared to “an association of ideas, ” which is exactly how Mr. Smith says this individual appreciated what they can inside a second confuse once again or perhaps overlook: “Which very poor Bobby do you just mean? ” (11–13).
  Anarchic-seeming because it sounded as soon as the Outrageous arrived on the scene, the idea soon became apparent that there's method in the madness and, taking into account the methodologies of forceful disorder inside the tradition associated with the avant-garde, the particular scandal of form in addition, inside all the mimicry regarding disorderly absence laughing upwards its sleeve, like Jane the maid who else confides on the target audience that the girl authentic name is Sherlock holmes Holmes as well as the time clock striking twenty-nine times (or striking as much as this likes); or to get that matter, inside systemic wobble at the play's inconstant heart, the compilation of baffling recognitions and misidentifications, all of them “true in theory” (23), this gratuitous unknown to which will, obviously, everything brings (though, to be perfectly genuine, it was a blunder by a actor of which Ionesco make stand, giving the play its title).  http://tummyfluff.co.uk  happens after Mrs. Martin states to the departing Flame Chief—who has revealed inside all subjectivity that their dream, his ideal, is a world in which usually everything provides caught fire—“Thanks to you, we now have approved a good truly Cartesian 1 / 4 of an hour. ” Whereupon, as if reminded to check out through on Descartes's approach to doubt, with this requisite objectivity, the Open fire Chief stops to state, “Speaking of that—the bald voz? ” Which is, like a philosophical question, the very first plus last we've been told of the girl, except—after “General silence in addition to embarrassment, ” the wit sneaking in—that “She usually wears your ex curly hair inside same style” (37). As for the totality involving inconsequence inside momentum of no sequitur, abrogating meaning and price, that barely draws an empty, which is usually to say there may be nothing to acquire although we get that nevertheless, such as “Nothing for you to be done” within Waiting around for Godot, the little or nothing that comes of little, or the abnormality regarding a nothingness that not really only passes some time but is basically formulaic.
 

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?

No 

if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”

 

How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?

 

Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)

Yes 

If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”

 

Any additional comments to add?

 
Created at 11/11/2020 10:12 AM  by  
Last modified at 11/11/2020 10:12 AM  by