RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #605,700
New ResponseNew Response
|
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?

No 

For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?

Always 

Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?

yes

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

AT&T

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?

dinghyspot16

What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?

dinghyspot16

What should be added to the SBRCs and why?

 

What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?


 Yet who can definitely argue that its showing the whole storyline? In our ardor for the elemental, we now have renewed, and always, ridiculously, the truths regarding the child years, neurosis, and savagery—opposing this apprehensions of fantasy together with magic to typically the misapprehensions connected with rationalism. Yet the melodramatic mindset, observed from anywhere nevertheless inside of itself, is finally weird. Inside melodrama, fact is definitely villainous and unnegotiable, and even the only way to begin to it is to help make one's individual appearing the indisputable center associated with all integrity. The alarmist hero is Faust devoid of Mephistopheles, undeterred will without having limit, Gargantua disguised because the hunchback of Notre Hie.
  To illustrate the melodramatic vision is not to help dispel it. So using the conduct of the particular students, when demands are escalated into the extreme inane. The generation that grew up affluently having a sense of power-lessness is now, really strongly, in the center connected with the phase. Ruthlessly sure they will get over, that they are still insisting of which nobody is listening. The fact is, certainly since Chicago, every person is listening—though that point alone may not modify cultural process or often the mechanisms put in place long before our military-industrial structure. This may even be of which we are dealing together with forces that are right now permanent, and hence really unnegotiable. Given the forces that will none of us all fully grasp, a persons mystery, protest can only be posture. It is at this particular point inside the movie theater that will we return to the particular tragic vision.
  Still, we have now lived through a period, this few years after Planet War II, if a souple sense of disaster seemed to be a pretext with regard to peace and quiet and evasion. In heartbreaking dilemma, the emotive lifestyle and history of the individual are organized to generate his fate.  http://www.docspal.com/viewer?id=mnfdbtwj-17692027  may possibly be similarly so in life, but we don't usually believe it. It's great that we don't think it. If life is definitely tragic, body fat reason to be able to live as if the idea were tragic—that's also including theater to theater. The result is a fake pathos. The activism of the sixties expanded out of impatience with that pathos—a type of sentimental melodrama. That began by finding power in a negative potential, by way of a refusal to relinquish the strength that had virtually no factor to think it got. A guy, many of us arrived to feel all over again, is not merely a great energy in time nevertheless a good view upon him self. The opinion is implicit in the sum of their acts. At the boundaries of this judgment, this ended up with increasing frequency the fact that Law's coherence seemed to be not all of our coherence. In order to the level the Law supposed the role involving Lives, there was defiance of the Law. Whatever the difficulties involving Destiny, we came to be able to behave as in the event we were in control. When that is a new awesome illusion, it is maybe the most precious optical illusion. This particular brings us once again to those expectations the fact that have clear and existing substance.
  If the wish for modification is sometimes magnified out of just about all possibility by the partisan, the particular resistance to transform remains some sort of scandal regardless of all empathy by way of uncomfortable humanists. Get real the most liberal not typically the unregenerate. Some of us are usually seriously chastened by college student refuse, nevertheless we happen to be beguiled by means of privilege, dissuaded by awards, deflected by simply Fulbrights, trapped by departments, and—even if conscience can be next to overwhelming—returned to be able to sin by way of academic detachment, the academic version to do your own thing. Therefore the relation takes area, with the administrators possessing the bag and the particular wholesale real estate flipper retaining the energy. Inevitably, the petitions comply with after, yet that's simply the reflex of a fixed character, returned by simply practice to a convention. The result is a humor at all of our expense. This is invariably the situation when scholars around the humanities are safeguarding their disciplines as in the event they were eternal verities, when in fact some sort of willpower is sustained just simply by the moving continuity from the dissolutions. Instead connected with invoking “standards” to maintain what is clearly not making it, we might pay attention to what has become documented all over our literature—that standards are discovered correctly in peril, as a new selection of abolitions; as William Carlos Williams says throughout Paterson, “knowledge, undispersed, the own undoing. ”
  The idea is astonishing simply how much uncatalogued precedent still operates in each of our procedures, though philosophically many of us know better. Even what we take to be study with the frontiers of know-how is still limited by means of needless usages from your former. We see that in every discipline that insists upon using the word because if there were being seriously defined limits of request rather than some sort of composition of hypotheses about like limits. In the humanities, whose province has customarily included manners and morals and the methods involving emotion, it may possibly turn out to be good to say that the most legitimate studies being done by experimenters beyond the system—by activists, mystics, niche workers, dope fiends, renegade priests, hippies, occultists, system fetishists, deviants, mutants, and even conscientious objectors. All these varieties have proven that the older uniform society of stable forms was severely limited in the repertoire of behaviour and lifestyle choices. Because we proceed inward via imperceptable area or facing outward to the galaxies, the values are being challenged by means of a vaster compound of available roles. Professors doing analyses of classic tomes the fact that illustrate the destructive ingredient or the demonic shedding of multiple persona or even excursions to the particular heart of night or even the perverse infractions with the Magic Theater are now facing students some associated with whom are conscientious practitioners of our most fun metaphors and formal methods. Chat of the Double as well as Secret Sharer, and he or she rests there, coolly, wanting to know whether you have the courage to help acknowledge your pet before your eyes.

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?

No 

if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”

 

How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?

 

Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)

Yes 

If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”

 

Any additional comments to add?

 
Created at 11/9/2020 11:20 PM  by  
Last modified at 11/9/2020 11:20 PM  by