RPA Data Center

Sample Copy: View Response #132,522
New ResponseNew Response
|
Edit ResponseEdit Response

SBRC Survey for Teachers

After discussion with the UESF Elementary Committee, SFUSD has put together a Task Force to review and provide guidance on revisions to the TK-5 Standards Based Report Cards.  The Task Force has defined the purpose of the SFUSD K-5 SBRC as follows: to provide a concise and periodic tool for communication among teachers, families and students that includes comprehensible information about a child’s social emotional development, academic development and unique assets.  In an effort to make this tool useful to teachers and families while serving the above purpose, feedback from both groups is essential.  Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on your experience with the SBRCs.
Are you a teacher who completes the SBRCs?

No 

For which grade(s) have you completed SBRCs?

How often do you use the available rubrics to inform your completion of the SBRCs?

Always 

Approximately how long do you spend completing an SBRC for one student in its entirety?

60 + minutes 

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the most useful for communicating with families?

yes

What aspects of the SBRC do you find the LEAST useful for communicating with families?

Ford Motor

What aspects of the SBRC do you think should not be changed?

banklight2

What aspects of the SBRC would you like to see changed for the 2015-2016 school year?

banklight2

What should be added to the SBRCs and why?

 

What should be omitted from the SBRCs and why?


 and substance use were all quantified using subscales created for the UCLA Teen
  Increase study (cf. Huba and Bentler, 1982; Newcomb et al., 1983). In the case of
  self-acceptance and relationships with peers, parents, and other adults, the participants were
  given two columns of statements, one affirmative and the other negative, and a 5-point
  Likert scale anchored by 1 (the response on the left is accurate for sure) and 5 (the response on
  the right is true for sure). The diverse course of answer alternatives was counterbalanced.
  Participants were requested to circle the number that best described "the way you're most of
  the time."  https://nudeace.com  consisted of four things.
  In the instance of of antisocial behaviour, participants were asked how many times over the
  previous 6 months they had engaged in various particular instances of petty or felony larceny,
  In the instance of of material use, participants were first
  asked how many times over the previous 6 months they'd used a broad variety of
  nonprescription, prescription, and illicit substances.
  times over the preceding 6 months they were involved in accidents while using these
  Materials.
  Quality of sexual relationships, experiences of pregnancy and STD, and suicidal ideation
  Suicidal ideation was
  measured in binary fashion by a single item asking whether or not the participant had
  contemplated suicide during the previous 6 months. Affecting STD transmission and
  pregnancy, the participants were asked whether the event happened in the past 6 months,
  and, if it occurred, whether it was experienced as positive or negative. Participants were
  also asked to rate the effect the event had on their life using a four-column format (no
  effect, some effect, moderate effect, and great effect).
  addressed by items asking whether the teenager had fallen deeply in love, begun dating
  a awesome boyfriend/girlfriend, or broken up with a boyfriend/girlfriend.
  RESULTS
  The correlations among the predictor variables appear in Table I. To reduce the general
  Amount and redundancy of the evaluations, the drug use (excluding alcohol and tobacco) and
  "antisocial behavior" items were subjected to distinguish main components analyses
  with varimax rotation. The amount of factors was determined by the eigenvalue [greater
  than] 1.0 rule and assessment of the Scree plots. As the goal of the process was data
  reduction, the dilemma of whether the resultant variables were substantively interpretable was
  secondary. The generated variable scores were then used as outcome measures signifying
  drug use and antisocial behavior.
 
  Each of the constant outcome measures was subjected to a standard multiple regression
  Evaluation. The model contained the predictors suggested above and interaction terms for
  Primal Scene Exposure x Sex and Nudity x Sex.
  regression was utilized.
  Because this study included the evaluation of a significant number of results, we determined
  OMITTED] needed. The Bonferroni method (using the amount of regressions)
  Set a critical p value of .0017. Nonetheless, it was determined that this was possibly also
  conservative as the results aren't for the most part independent. Thus, we selected p =
  Coefficients significant at 0.0025 [less than] p [less than] 0.05
  were considered as tendencies just.
  The principal components analyses afforded five drug use factors (72% clarified
  variance) and four anti-social behaviour variables (58% explained variance). The drug use
  factors are thus called Hard Drugs - highest loading items: (i) Sedatives, minor
  narcotics; and (v) Diamorphine, barbiturates, cocaine, inhalants. The anti-social behavior
  variables are hence labeled Anti-Social behaviour: theft, vandalism, felonies, and fighting.
  As a result of extremely low dropout rate virtually all issues provided result data. As such,
  the ns for each evaluation range just from 181 to 189. In general, we deemed the data
  Proper for multiple regression; no major breaches of the assumption of the process
  were evident. The inclusion of the interaction terms did reduce tolerance but not to an
  unacceptable level.
  appear in Table II and the distribution of binary predictor and outcome variables appears
  Frequencies for exposure to the primary predictor variables are as follows: For exposure to
  primal pictures, 63 (32%) children were exposed (lads n = 34, girls n = 29), whereas 133

Are you satisfied with the timing/ pacing of the SBRCs during the year?

No 

if no, then “What changes in timing or pacing of the SBRCs would you like to see?”

 

How challenging was it to use Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What feedback do you have on using Synergy TeacherVue to complete your SBRCs?

 

What additional comments do you have that would inform the revision of our district’s SRBCs for 2014-2015?

 

Would you like to participate in hands-on revision of the SBRC as a member of the Task Force? (extended hour compensation is provided)

Yes 

If yes: “Please provide your email for more information.”

 

Any additional comments to add?

 
Created at 6/10/2020 12:26 AM  by  
Last modified at 6/10/2020 12:26 AM  by